Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnjarini, Tyas Putri
dc.contributor.authorZacharias, Nugrahenny T.
dc.descriptionEnglish.Edu, Vol. 9, No. 2, July 2009, p. 145-166en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study reports the strategies in overcoming the unexpected argument of nine English Department students during their study in a private university in Indonesia. Seeing the debate activity as the hardest activity in Public speaking class, this study has the purpose to explore students' strategies in overcoming the unexpected argument in debate session. The study used content analysis to capture the strategies in dealing with the unexpected argument. Qualitative analysis was conducted to explore the findings. Data were collected through a Stimulated Recall Interview in order to remind the students toward the unexpected argument. Riessman (2008) says content analysis is served as an analytical data which focuses on the contents or themes across the nine students' strategies. The result shows two major strategies in dealing with the unexpected argument, they are Schema theory and socio-cultural strategies. Schema theory includes previous education, own experience, and ethnicity history. Pedagogical implications are offered at the end of the paper.en_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Language and Literature, Satya Wacana Christian Universityen_US
dc.subjectunexpected argumenten_US
dc.subjectschema theoryen_US
dc.subjectpublic speakingen_US
dc.titleSchema and Socio – Cultural Strategies to Counter Argue Unexpected Arguments in Debate Activityen_US
Appears in Collections:English.Edu 2009 Vol. 9 No. 2 July

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.