Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/27323
Title: | Pemaknaan Ruang Publik Menurut Jurgen Habermas Terhadap Klub Sinema Sisifus Sebagalayar Alternatif |
Authors: | Soesanto, Julianus Derry |
Keywords: | komunikasi;film;layar alternatif;ruang publik;jurgen habermas |
Issue Date: | 18-Jun-2021 |
Abstract: | Diantara ketatnya regulasi bioskop komersil serta aturan moralistik
masyarakat yang dirasa menghambat kreativitas dan kebebasan berekspresi, layar
alternatif mampu menjadi ruang bebas yang mudah diakses oleh sineas dan
penonton (masyarakat) dengan beraneka ragam pilihan bentuk film. Hal tersebut
karena layar alternatif tidak memiliki standar yang ketat layaknya bioskop
komersil. Di Indonesia sendiri terdapat banyak sekali layar alternatif yang berdiri
secara independen, salah satunya yaitu Klub Sinema Sisifus di Salatiga. Penelitian
ini ditujukan untuk melihat bagaimana pemaknaan ruang publik menurut Jurgen
Habermas terhadap Klub Sinema Sisifus sebagai layar alternatif. Metode penelitian
yang dipakai adalah kualitatif dengan menghimpun data dari observasi partisipan,
wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka yang pada akhirnya dianalisis
menggunakan lima premis ruang publik menurut Hardiman. Dari hasil penelitian,
Klub Sinema Sisifus dapat dimaknai sebagai ruang publik menurut Jurgen
Habermas karena semua premis terpenuhi With the strict regulation of commercial cinema and moralistic rules of society which are felt to hamper the creativity and freedom of expression, alternative screens are able to become a free space which is easily accessible by filmmakers and public with a variety choices of film. It happened because alternative screens doesn't have any strict standards as commercial cinemas. In Indonesia, there are many alternative screens who's stand independently, one of them is “Klub Sinema Sisifus” in Salatiga. This study aims to see the meaning of public sphere by Jurgen Habermas to “Klub Sinema Sisifus” as alternative screens. This study used qualitative method with participant observation as datcollection method, interview and literature, review and it would be analyzed with five premise of public sphere by Hardiman. From the final research of study, “Klub Sinema Sisifus” could be interpreted as a public sphere according to Jurgen Habermas because qualified by all the premise. |
URI: | https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/27323 |
Appears in Collections: | T1 - Communication |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1_362015106_Bab I.pdf | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Bab II.pdf | 458.14 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Bab III.pdf | 281.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Bab IV.pdf | 2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Bab V.pdf | 590.3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Bab VI.pdf | 157.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Daftar Pustaka.pdf | 191.82 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Judul.pdf | 5.53 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
T1_362015106_Lampiran.pdf | 28.73 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.