Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFadjar, A. Mukthie
dc.descriptionRefleksi Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Edisi April 2009, p. 1-6id
dc.description.abstractMahkamah Konstitusi (MK) has a fundamental role in addressing human rights issue in Indonesia. As the guardian of the constitution, MK should protect human rights provision under Chapter XA of the UUD 1945. In order to complete its function, MK has an authority to invalidate unconstitutional legislation by judicial review mechanism. A legislation can be declared unconstitutional if it violates human rights provision of the UUD 1945. The problematic of judicial review of human rights in Indonesia is the vague relationship between Art. 281.1 and Art. 281.2 of the UUD 1945. The author suggests that Art. 281.2 the UUD 1945 can not be utilized as an ultimate tool to derogate Art. 28I.l of the UUD 1945. But in the capital punishment constitutionality case the author thinks that it should be a matter of legal policy of the government as a legislator which can not be intervened by MKid
dc.publisherFakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacanaid
dc.subjectmahkamah konstitusiid
dc.subjecthuman rightsen
dc.subjectcapital punishmenten_US
dc.titleMahkamah Konstitusi dan HAM : Masalah Pidana Matiid
Appears in Collections:Refleksi Hukum 2009 - April

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ART_A. Mukthie Fadjar_Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Ham_Abstract.pdfAbstract312.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
ART_A. Mukthie Fadjar_Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Ham_Full text.pdfFull text124.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.